|
|
NC ANIMAL NEWS
** If you have news you would like added to
this page let us know. **
**********************************************************
Euthanasia methods scrutinized
By Gena Smith
Published:
Sunday, May 18, 2008 10:07 AM
EDT
LUMBERTON — Everyone agrees that the
intravenous method of putting down
animals is more humane than the
method currently used at the county
pound. But county officials say its
cost, about $70,000 a year, is too
much for a poor county.
Five members of the county Health
Board took a tour of the 5-year-old
animal shelter last week to see the
two methods of euthanasia performed.
Currently, the shelter uses the
intracardiac method, or the heart
stick — shots that are made directly
into the heart of a sedated animal.
On Wednesday, during the tour,
shelter staff put five dogs and one
cat to death with heart sticks.
Michael Deese, a veterinarian who
serves on the Health Board,
performed IV euthanasia on one
sedated dog to show the difference
in the techniques.
“(The heart stick) way ... it may
not be in the heart, just the chest
cavity, and it takes longer,” Deese
said as he went back checking for
signs of life on the seven animals
after the euthanasia had been
performed.
Faith Walker, a local animal
activist, has threatened legal
action against the county if the IV
method is not adopted. She also
wants euthanasia performed in
isolation, and not in front of other
animals.
County Health Director Bill Smith
says the heart stick is cheaper and
quicker and “approved by the Humane
Society.”
The decision to visit the county pound was made after Walker came to
the April meeting of the Health
Board, but Smith didn’t want to
concede Wednesday’s tour was under
duress.
“Several of the Board of Health
members had never seen it,” Smith
said. “We’ve been talking so much
about the shelter, they decided to
see it.”
John Adams, a member of the Health
Board and local optometrist, said
the tour gave him confidence.
“I just want to make sure we are
within the law and within the humane
guidelines,” he said after the tour.
“I really don’t see where we are
doing anything that someone can take
legal action.”
Money and time
According to Jeff Bass, the manager
of the pound, the IV method would
involve two additional staff members
because it takes more time.
“The big part to me is that we are
done with euthanasia by 10 o’clock —
the time frame the county has given
us,” Bass said. “That’s the reason I
said additional help would be
needed.”
Bass said the IV method would call
for a space that the euthanasia
would be performed. Because the
shelter is so long, it would take
extra time to get the animals from
their cages to the euthanasia table.
Bass said on average, between May
and September, about 50 animals are
euthanized each week.
The materials, he said, wouldn’t
cost much. They would include a
table, swabs, alcohol and a razor.
“Is that a lot of money?” Bass said.
“Probably not, but it’s still
another step in the process, and you
still have to spend the money.”
Tom Taylor, a county commissioner
and chairman of the Health Board,
said he’s not sure that money can be
found. The commissioners held a
budget workshop last week and
reviewed a county budget that keeps
the tax rate the same, includes a
hiring freeze, and delays capital
projects.
“Right now, I don’t see where we’re
able to do it,” Taylor said. “Were
trying to keep taxes down.”
Adams agreed.
“The biggest constraint would be the
monetary thing,” Adams said. “My
question was: Is there someway to
increase the revenue to raise the
money ... What the county can
afford, I think, it’s the practical
thing to do.”
The shelter opens to the public at
10 a.m., giving the three-person
staff two hours to put the animals
to death and clean up for the
public.
But according Walker, additional
staff isn’t necessary.
“It’s just another excuse not to do
the proper thing,” Walker said. “If
they can’t be out there at work and
get things done, they need to get to
work an hour earlier.”
Lee Hunter, director of Animal
Welfare for the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture, said he
isn’t sure about time and cost, but
he’s sure about skill level.
“It doesn’t require as much skill to
do it intravenous,” Hunter said.
“When you do it intracardiac you
have to hit a place that you cannot
see. In an IV, you can see the vein
you are trying to hit.”
Euthanasia room
When the building was built in 2003,
a room was created specifically for
euthanasia. However, that room now
holds cats.
“It has, at times, been used for
euthanasia,” Smith said. “But again,
when the regulations changed as to
the number of cats you could have
per pen, we had to have more space
for cats.”
Smith said it is the staff that
decides on space use.
“Where that room is at, it’s not
feasible,” Bass said. “The room you
could use, but then where do you put
the animals once they are
euthanized? Once the medicine goes
into the system they don’t die right
away. If you have a big day that
day, that room isn’t going to hold
everybody.”
The building currently has unused
space toward the rear.
“We could always go back there in
the back and go off to the side,”
Bass said. “It would be time
consuming to move the animals all
the way to the back.”
Walker, with tears in her eyes, said
People for Ethical Treatment of
Animals says euthanasia should never
be performed in front of others.
Walker doesn’t stand alone on this
issue.
Ken Windley, the county manager,
wrote a letter to Smith dated Dec.
4, 2003, that read in part: “The
front left room was to be the
euthanasia room. I would recommend
it be used and not put animals to
sleep in cages.”
Last week Windley said he has no
authority over the health director.
“The front room was set up for that
purpose, if he wanted to use it for
the purpose,” Windley said. “I guess
they’ve chosen to do their
euthanasia elsewhere ... the
(health) board and the staff decides
where to do it.”
On Wednesday, the cat was euthanized
in its cage and the dogs were
euthanized right outside the open
cages.
“I guess they could figure someway
to move the dogs to another room,”
Adams said. “In an ideal world, we’d
have them all adopted.”
No state law
State laws don’t exist for
euthanasia, but that is expected to
soon change.
“At this point in time there are no
certain requirements under state
law,” Hunter said.
According to Brian Long, director of
Public Affairs for the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services, there are no
training requirements to perform
euthanasia, and no specifics on
where it is performed.
Long said the new laws would require
certification for administering
euthanasia. They would also place
specific guidelines on how and where
euthanasia takes place.
“Until they take effect there are no
real standards or requirements in
place,” Long said. “If the Rules
Review Commission signs off on them,
then my understanding is they take
effect 30 days after that. It could
be within the next couple of months
or it could be within the year.”
Adams said it might be more prudent
to wait for the state before changes
are made.
“ ... What they are doing is within
the law and within the Humane
Society’s guidelines, and we’re
about to have a new law ... why do
something now when you’ll have to
change things anyway,” Adams said.
back to top
**********************************************************
|
|
Published: May 13, 2008 05:32 PM
Modified: May 13, 2008 05:32 PM
Record number of pets adopted
By Sarah McNeil, Staff Reporter
Johnston County — It was love at first sight for Heather
Combs.
For months, Combs and her three daughters had been looking
for a companion for their two dogs, Milo and Jesse. Their
search ended at the Johnston County Animal Shelter, where
they spotted Jackie, a 2-year-old Husky mix.
Jackie and her two puppies had been surrendered to the
shelter. The puppies were quickly adopted, but Jackie sat in
a lonely cage for two weeks before Combs came along.
“Every other dog in the whole place was barking and [Jackie]
just sat there, just as pretty as can be,” said Combs, of
the Cleveland community. “I said, ‘We are not going to leave
her, so let’s take her home.’”
Jackie was one of 127 animals adopted from the shelter in
March. Director Ernie Wilkinson said it was the highest
number of animals ever adopted from the shelter in one
month. On average, about 30 pets a month find a new home, he
said.
But thanks to the media, dedicated staff and the help of
more than 25 foster and rescue groups, more people are
adopting from the shelter, Wilkinson said. “This is where we
have been working to be for three years,” he said. “We are
finally beginning to get there.”
Coming to a new home has been an adjustment for Jackie. She
can still be mischievous, digging holes in the yard, eating
rental-movie cases and hogging the bed. The feisty dog
enjoys watching television and appliances, such as the fan,
in motion. Jackie was the first dog the Combs adopted from a
shelter, but she certainly won’t be the last.
“Now I tell everybody ‘You need to go to one of the shelters
and get a dog,’” Combs said.
“I would definitely say if you have room in your home and in
your heart, definitely go to the shelter and give a dog a
second chance. I don’t think we could have picked a better
dog from the shelter.”
Another dog, Girly Girl, has been a comfort to Liz Parrish
of Four Oaks and her daughter, Morgan, since their Golden
retriever Champ died unexpectedly in March. Girly Girl,
originally named Harley, was found wandering on Brodgen Road
near Smithfield and carried to the shelter.
Parrish and her daughter were impressed with Girly Girl’s
quiet demeanor. “It was something about her...it was almost
like her eyes were smiling at you,” Parrish said
As Parrish took a closer look, she noticed the American bull
and boxer mix had scars on her back, hip and face. The scars
made Parrish think the dog’s former owner had abused her.
“I can’t stand to see an abused animal,” she said. “There is
no point to it. They can’t defend themselves. There are so
many out there that need homes just like we need homes.”
Girly Girl fits in with the family perfectly. She loves to
look out the window, eat sandals and chew on squeaky toys.
The 1-year-old dog enjoys sitting on laps and having her
tummy rubbed when she is not playing outside in the yard.
“It’s like she’s always been here,” Parrish said.
Girly Girl might not be the only pet for much longer.
“We are thinking of fostering or getting another dog,”
Parrish said. “People need to be more aware of the animal
shelter, and they do have the best animals, period.”
http://www.theherald-nc.com/front/story/8173.html
back to
top
**********************************************************
Video of Alleged
Animal Abuse by
Trooper Played
in Court
Posted: Apr. 28,
2008
Updated: Today
at 2:28 p.m.
Raleigh,
N.C. —
A
court
hearing
began Monday
to decide
whether a
state
trooper
fired for
alleged
animal abuse
will get his
job back.
Former Sgt.
Charles
Jones, a
12-year
veteran in
charge of
K-9 training
for the
Highway
Patrol, was
fired in
September
after
another
trooper
turned over
two
15-second
video clips
of him
allegedly
abusing his
K-9 partner,
Ricoh.
(Caution:
Contents of
the video
may disturb
some
viewers.)
The
Office of
Administrative
Hearings – a
quasi-judicial
agency –
began
proceedings
Monday in a
lawsuit that
Jones filed
against the
state in
December,
alleging
that
procedures
were
violated
when he was
fired. The
hearing will
reconvene on
Tuesday.
Monday's
proceedings
focused on
the video
clips that
Trooper Ray
Herndon
recorded on
his cell
phone after
he saw Jones
using what
he thought
might be
abusive
techniques
at a
training
exercise in
Garner last
summer.
"I was
torn; I
didn't know
what to do.
Should I go
stop him?"
Herndon, a
21-year-veteran
of the
force,
testified
Monday. "So
I did what I
thought was
right at the
time."
Court
documents
say the
incident
began when
Ricoh
refused to
release a
chew reward.
One video
shows Jones
tying the
dog's leash
to a high
railing so
that only
his hind
legs touched
the ground.
He then
kicked the
dog's leg
four times.
"Then
he'd pull
him back up
a good
distance off
the ground,
using the
lead in an
attempt to
get the dog
to lech the
toy or let
the toy go,"
Herndon
said. He
added that
he did not
think Jones
was
intentionally
trying to
harm or
abuse Ricoh.
The
second video
clip shows
Jones
apparently
leaving the
dog alone,
hanging
upright from
its leash
and collar.
Jones'
lawyer, Jack
O'Hale,
claimed that
the video
clips show
Jones using
training
techniques
that he had
been taught
by the
Highway
Patrol.
Ricoh was a
particularly
aggressive
dog that
required
extra
training,
the attorney
said.
"Sgt.
Jones acted
in the
manner in
which he was
trained,
even though
it was an
ugly
manner,"
O'Hale said.
The
Highway
Patrol's
manual does
not specify
any
dog-training
methods that
are banned
or allowed,
O'Hale said.
He described
commonly
used
methods,
such as
swinging a
dog around
by the neck
or wrestling
it to the
ground and
holding its
jaws open,
that could
be
considered
abusive.
Capt. Ken
Castelloe,
head of the
patrol's
internal
affairs
office,
testified
that the
first video
clip was
ordinary,
but not the
second.
Castelloe
said he was
disturbed
that Jones
had left
Ricoh after
the dog
dropped the
toy.
Bryan
Beatty,
secretary of
the state
Department
of Crime
Control and
Public
Safety,
testified
that Jones
was fired
only after a
careful
review.
"I
concluded
that that
was not a
technique
that anyone
had seen,"
Beatty said.
"It was not
a technique
that was
acceptable
within
Highway
Patrol
policy."
O'Hale
repeated
charged that
the
Governor's
Press Office
pressured
the Highway
Patrol to
fire Jones
without due
process. In
a deposition
last week,
Lt. Col.
Cecil
Lockley said
that
"unlawful
political
intervention"
forced him
to fire
Jones.
Beatty
and the
Highway
Patrol made
public their
intentions
to fire
Jones a day
before his
pre-dismissal
hearing,
O'Hale said.
The
assistant
district
attorney
argued that
the video
itself
provided
enough
evidence to
justify
Jones'
firing, and
the state
did not act
inappropriately.
In court
documents,
the Highway
Patrol said
that Beatty,
not Lockley,
made the
final
decision to
fire Jones.
O'Hale
argued that
Jones became
a victim of
the Highway
Patrol's
efforts to
clean up
after a
series of
embarrassing
misconduct
allegations
were laid
against
troopers.
The incident
also
occurred
during the
height of
the
dog-fighting
scandal
surrounding
Atlanta
Falcons
quarterback
Michael
Vick, the
attorney
said.
Gov. Mike
Easley
ordered the
Highway
Patrol to
hire a
consultant
to review
its
procedures,
including
the hiring,
training and
promotion of
troopers.
The
consultant's
findings are
expected in
the next few
weeks.
A
veterinarian
examined
Ricoh and
found that
he was OK
shortly
after the
training
exercise.
The Highway
Patrol
removed
Ricoh from
Jones' care,
and the dog
is no longer
actively
working on
the force.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/2803389
back to top
**********************************************************
Article of the week from North Carolina Lawyers Weekly:
Animals first in new firm
By DIANA SMITH, Staff Writer
A little girl scrambles along the edge of a swimming pool at
a Wisconsin resort, her eyes fixed upon a chipmunk flailing
in the aqua water.
Her parents, escorting her to dinner, assure her that the
furry creature will paddle its way to safety. But on the
family's return trip, it was still struggling.
Before anyone can stop her, the youngster seizes the animal,
and it scurries to safety but not before thanking her with a
farewell bite.
That was Raleigh attorney Calley Gerber at age six, a
compassionate child with a love for two things animals and
how to protect them.
"It's always been that way," she said. "Animals first."
Now, Gerber is applying that sentiment to her profession.
Today, she opens her own practice Gerber Animal Law Center
which will focus exclusively on animal issues.
It's the first of its kind in North Carolina, according to
Bill Reppy, who heads Duke University's Animal Law Project.
Other lawyers might handle a handful of cases involving
animals cruelty, dog bites, custody issues but very few
strike out into such territory on their own. Reppy knows of
just two attorneys who have created self-sustaining animal
law practices, one in Illinois and the other in Washington
state.
That makes Gerber's new firm a groundbreaking, but risky,
venture. And she knows it.
"I decided to open an animal law firm, which some people
which all people say you can't make a living at," Gerber
said. "If it's meant to be, it's meant to be. I've done a
lot of things people told me I couldn't do."
But increased attention to animal abuse in recent years,
both in the Carolinas and nationally, may mean that the
tides have turned in Gerber's favor. North Carolina is the
only state in the nation with a statute that allows private
litigants to bring civil charges against violators of animal
cruelty laws.
Other positive examples: In the past three years, laws were
passed in both Carolinas that upgraded cockfighting to
felonies. In 2006, South Carolina became the fourth state in
the nation to ban "hog dog" fighting, where trained attack
dogs fight trapped feral pigs.
Still, North Carolina placed in the bottom tier for the
comprehensiveness of its state animal protection laws in
2007, according to an Animal Legal Defense Fund study. South
Carolina fared slightly better, ranked in the middle tier.
A lifelong animal lover, Apex attorney Marianna Burt felt
that she would be unable to make a living with an
animal-only practice when she graduated from UNC in 1989.
Today, she relies on her indigent criminal defense work as
her bread and butter, but devotes 50 percent of her time to
animal law cases. However, 60-70 percent of that animal work
is pro bono, she said.
But winds of change appear to be blowing. Ninety-six of the
196 ABA-accredited law schools in the United States now
offer courses in animal law, up from nine that offered them
in 2000.
"This is probably the right time for someone to be doing
this full-time," said Burt. "Certain practices that are more
lucrative, such as veterinary malpractice and custody
issues, are really taking the field. You didn't see that a
few years ago."
'SAVE THE WORLD'
Gerber's decision to open her animal law firm did not come
easily. She spent her first five years after law school as a
prosecutor in Colorado a dream come true for the woman who
wanted to use her position to promote legal reform.
"But then my student loans came out of deferment, and I
realized that I couldn't live on that," she said. "I was
taking a pack of Saltines and a can of peas for lunch. I
literally lost two sizes in one month. I finally had to say,
'If I'm going to starve to death to prosecute, I probably
should do something else.'"
Gerber moved to North Carolina and joined Wakefield
Development as in-house counsel. But after eight years, she
felt increasingly unfulfilled. She just didn't love her
work.
"I've always had that 'save the world' pull. I think that's
why I wanted to prosecute," she said. "But I told myself to
be grateful that I had a job that allowed me to pay my
debts."
With her two dogs, Presley and Justice, at her side, she
sought happiness through increased activity with Great Dane
rescue and other animal organizations.
But spending 40 or more hours of the business week doing
unrewarding work took its toll. Gerber began to doubt if she
was even meant to be an attorney a terrifying thought for a
woman who told her mother at age 12 that she was going to be
a lawyer.
So she hired a life coach.
A battery of tests revealed two things: Gerber was born to
be a lawyer. But she would never be happy in corporate law.
"The next day, I quit," she said.
She gave Wakefield three months notice. It was not an
acrimonious breakup. Before her departure, the company even
created a temporary Web page for Gerber to advertise her new
endeavor.
Doubt inevitably crept in.
"The reality of quitting feels good for the first five
minutes, and then there's this 'Oh, my God, how am I going
to pay my bills?' sensation," she said.
"Then I decided fear is not a positive emotion and that I
had to let the bad stuff go so that good things could come
in."
And so Gerber Animal Law Center was born.
DREAM BIG
Gerber's life coach posed a hypothetical question: "You're
on the cover of a national publication. What's the magazine
and what's the story?"
"It was the easiest question for me to answer," she said.
"I'm on the cover of Time magazine, and I've stopped factory
farming."
Indeed, the treatment of farm animals is one of the issues
that Gerber hopes to tackle as she develops her animal law
practice. One exemption to the criminal statutes for animal
abuse N.C. G.S. Sect. 14-360 precludes prosecution for
cruelty to animals raised for food and agribusiness.
"The abandonment of the North Carolina legislature about the
treatment of farm animals is shocking," said Reppy, from
Duke. "It's so irrational that it's unconstitutional."
That's why Reppy is "simply delighted" that Gerber is
willing to be an animal law pioneer. He envisions
collaboration between Duke's animal law clinic and Gerber's
new practice.
"We'll be able to help Calley by getting the students in our
clinic to work with her and do research," Reppy said.
And while Gerber has her dream projects like the creation of
more humane livestock laws, teaching at area law schools and
amending the law that treats animals as property she is
adamant that she is a realist, not an extremist.
"I'm not saying that animals need to have the status of
human beings, but at the same time, if someone intentionally
kills your animal, they shouldn't only recover just the
actual cost of property," she said.
"If your dog is a mutt, you get zero damages under the
market value test in most states. It just isn't clear where
North Carolina stands on that," Reppy said.
In the past few weeks, publicity and word-of-mouth has led
more than a dozen people to call Gerber with animal law
questions. One woman wanted to know what actions she could
take against a neighbor who shot and killed her dog as it
ran away from him.
"A lot of people just want someone to listen to them," said
Gerber. "Granted, that doesn't make any money or make the
firm go, but in the early stages that's what I've been
doing."
The sad reality is that some of those callers will have to
be turned away.
"To sue is costly, and the remedy is limited in these cases,
so there's a decision to make," Gerber said. "I know a lot
of these cases will be take-it-and-lose, take-it-and-lose,
take-it-and lose. But at the same time, that's how the laws
get changed."
FOCUS AND PRIORITIES
Exactly what will Gerber Animal Law Center do?
It's a work in progress, Gerber said.
While she would never shy away from prosecuting, one of the
major focuses of Gerber's firm will be preventive measures
that protect animals.
Included in that category is the establishment of pet trusts
and estates. According to the 2007-2008 National Pet Owners
Survey, 63 percent of American households now own pets. But
very few owners have set up protections for them when they
die.
"Five hundred thousand animals are euthanized each year
because owners haven't made provisions for them," said
Gerber.
Gerber also wants to use her legal
expertise to help people in animal-related professions such
as dog groomers and dog-walkers set up businesses and draft
contracts. Also falling under the umbrella could be
veterinary malpractice cases. She'd even be happy to do
special prosecution if the D.A.'s office was overburdened,
she said.
One of Gerber's grand visions is to
see a rescue organization hold a fundraiser that would give
it the money to retain her services to go after someone
accused of cruelty, such as dog-fighters.
"I don't know if this is something I
can live on," she said. "I've been told that it's been tried
before and that it's very, very hard, depressing work.
Because the protections aren't there, you're constantly
faced with not being able to get the right thing done. You
have to tell people that the law isn't there yet. I know
that people won't necessarily be calling me because they're
happy. Usually something bad has happened.
"Maybe I've read too many of those
books: Follow your passion and everything else will fall
into place. I've been in practice 12 years. If I fall on my
face, I can get another job. But if I never try, how will I
know?
"You achieve what you believe, and I
very much believe that."
Questions or comments may be directed
to
diana.smith@nc.lawyersweekly.com.
ANIMAL LAW EDUCATION
A look at what law schools in North
Carolina offer in animal law courses and related student
organizations:
Duke University
- Home to the Animal Law Project,
which offers courses and a clinic.
- Has the student Animal Law Society.
Wake Forest University
- First offered an animal law course
in Fall 2004.
- Established a Student Animal Legal
Defense Fund chapter this year.
http://www.nclawyersweekly.com
**********************************************************
April 13th, 2008
By Melanie Davis and Caroline
Monday
Melanie@mountaintimes.com
CMonday@mountaintimes.com
CLICK HERE FOR RELATED VIDEO
Seventy-seven dogs and three
dead puppies were seized during
a search warrant executed at a
home located at 10430 N.C. 194
north near Todd Thursday
evening.
The search warrant was the
result of a joint investigation
between the Watauga County
Sheriff’s Office and the Watauga
County Animal Care and Control
department.

Animal
Care and Control officer Steve
Norris holds one of
the seized dogs that appears to
be suffering from mange.
Photo by Caroline Monday
According to officers with
Animal Care and Control, the
investigation began with a stray
dog picked up in that area of
the county. The dog was in poor
condition leading to an
investigation.
On March 13 Animal Control
officers visited the residence
on N.C. 194 with a sheriff’s
deputy and seized three dogs and
one dead dog.
Anna Mae Warner, 18, was
charged at that time with three
counts of cruelty to animals,
with another charge filed at a
later date. She is scheduled to
appear in district court on
April 22 in lieu of a $2,500
unsecured bond to face those
charges.
The investigation into
Warner’s treatment of the
numerous animals at her home
continued after that arrest
warrant was served.
Warner is alleged to have
been breeding “toy” dogs for
sale. Of the animals seized,
there were miniature schnauzer,
Papillon, Maltese, Jack Russell,
toy poodles, Yorkshire terriers,
shih tzu, chihauhua, pug,
Pomeranian, spitz, Pekingese,
Boston terrier and cocker
spaniel breeds.
A statement from the
sheriff’s office said the cause
of the seizure was the lack of
medical treatment for the dogs
and the animals not being fed
and watered properly.
Local veterinarians are
seeing the animals beginning on
Friday, treating them for
malnutrition, dehydration and
mange.

Seventy-seven animals were
seized at one time.
Photo by Caroline Monday
The investigation by the
Watauga County Sheriff’s Office
is ongoing and further charges
against Warner are pending.
The bulk of the animals are
being housed at the Animal Care
and Control office, while the
Watauga County Humane Society is
assisting the officers with the
care of the animals.
The younger puppies, pregnant
dogs and some others are in the
Humane Society’s shelter. That
location is better equipped to
handle those special needs
animals, according to officials.
The dogs that have been
seized are considered evidence
in a criminal case. Therefore,
the animals are not available
for adoption or foster care.
They must remain in the custody
of Animal Control and the Humane
Society until the disposal of
the case through the court
system. The Animal Control
officers may only feed, clean
and provide medical care to the
animals until a decision is
reached in court.
The public can help by
fostering the other dogs in the
care of Animal Control. The
facility is near full capacity
due to the seizure.
Other strays and unwanted
animals need foster homes until
a permanent location can be
found.

The
animals will be kept at the
county facilities and at the
Humane
Society shelter until the court
decides the case.
Photo by Caroline Monday
Warner’s operation falls
under the classification of a
puppy mill. The legal definition
of this term is anyone who owns
more than five breeding age,
unspayed female dogs and is not
licensed by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture as a dog breeder.
Humane Society shelter
manager Lynn Northup said, “The
problem with puppy mills is that
they do not care about the
quality of the animals. There is
more concern for the money than
for their care and well being.”
Northup also gave warning
signs for those interested in
purchasing a pure breed dog. “If
you’re going to buy a pet
instead of getting one from a
shelter or a breed rescue, ask
to see the parents, ask to see
where they were living.”
She said red flags to look
for include advertisements for
five to six different breeds
from the same person, or the
breeder asking to meet in a
parking lot or place other than
the kennel.

Photo by
Caroline Monday
back to top
**********************************************************
Mar 18, 2008
Forest Service rejects
raccoon, bear hunt proposal
By
Harrison Metzger
Times-News Staff Writer
The N.C. Forest Service has
rejected a proposal from state wildlife
officials to allow bear and raccoon
hunting with dogs on DuPont State Forest
this year.
The Division of Forest Resources
approved a plan by the N.C. Wildlife
Resources Commission to expand deer
hunting season from two to three days a
week, adding Thursday to lottery hunts
that have in the past been held on
Friday and Saturday each fall.
But following the second consecutive
year of public opposition to hunting
with dogs at DuPont, the Forest Service
rejected plans for bear and raccoon
hunts at the 10,400-acre forest.
"We are going to sit down with the
Wildlife Commission and look at those
bear populations out there right now to
see what they need to do to manage that
resource," State Forester Wib Owen said
Monday. "That (bear hunting) will be on
hold until we have a chance to sit down
and evaluate that."
Owen said his agency made the decision
in collaboration with the secretary of
the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources.
The Wildlife Resources Commission first
proposed bear hunting last year, citing
complaints of nuisance bears from
developments near the forest. DuPont
straddles the southern border of
Henderson and Transylvania counties and
is the most popular state forest in
North Carolina for hikers, cyclists,
equestrians and other outdoor
enthusiasts.
However some residents who live near the
forest and others who use DuPont
objected to hunting with dogs. They said
hunting dogs should not be allowed off
leash because other forest users are
required to keep their dogs leashed.
State officials say the black bear
population has been growing in the
mountains and across the state, but they
don't have any specific data for how
many bears inhabit DuPont and
surrounding lands.
"We weren't ready to evaluate or make
that decision until we looked at the
data," Owen said.
The DuPont State Forest Advisory
Committee split on the issue of whether
to allow bear and raccoon hunting, but
supported expanding lottery hunting for
deer from two to three days weekly
during hunting season.
Transylvania County resident Charles
Parris, who represents sportsmen on the
advisory committee, favored allowing the
bear and raccoon hunts. Parris said dogs
already roam freely in DuPont because it
is hard to enforce the leash law.
He said he was not surprised by the
decision, but was not happy about it.
"I still think there's plenty of bear. I
know there are," said Parris, who hunts
deer but not bear. "I still think really
and truly they should have listened to
the wildlife resources on it. They know
the population."
But Gloria Clouse, president of the
Friends of DuPont Forest, praised the
decision. The group of volunteers
opposed bear hunting with dogs on the
forest.
"I think they are taking a very good
approach to study it further and really
get some solid data on the bear
population to see if they do need to
have a hunt," Clouse said. "I think it
is really good they are collecting the
data first and making a decision
afterwards. "
Click here to go to website
back to top
**********************************************************
Local
shelter moves away from gas, toward
injection for euthanasia
March 14, 2008 - 2:16PM
After years of euthanizing dogs
and cats in a gas chamber, the
Alamance County animal shelter
within a few weeks will do most
of its euthanizing through
lethal injection. Some animal
activists have opposed use of
the gas chamber at the shelter,
arguing that it is inhumane.
While the state allows shelters
to use properly operated gas
chambers, Burlington Animal
Services decided to change to
the lethal-injection method
because it's considered more
acceptable by the public.
"People tend to relate gas to
Nazi war times," said Tamee
Penley, supervisor of animal
services. "I think you can do
anything wrong. I think there is
a proper way to use gas and a
proper way to use injection."
The hope is that implementing
the change will improve people's
perceptions of the animal
shelter, said Burlington police
Capt. Greg Seel, who oversees
the shelter.
"We've heard both sides of it
for years," Seel said.
"Switching over to injection may
help the image that animal
shelters have."
Regardless of the switch,
animal services will not
eliminate the gas chamber.
"The plan is to keep it for
wildlife and dangerous animals
and situations where safety is
an issue," Penley said. "I don't
think that percentage will be
very big."
Before animal services could
even consider switching its
euthanasia methods, renovations
had to be done at the shelter so
there was space available to do
injections. A barn was renovated
to make room for it.
"We lowered the ceiling and
put some tables and lights in
there," Penley said. "It's away
from everything and quieter so
we actually have a place to do
it now."
About six weeks ago, the
staff at animal services started
training to perform the
procedure. They have all
received the classroom portion
of the training, and several of
them are still working on the
hands-on training, which is
being done under the supervision
of a retired veterinarian, Dr.
Donald Courtney.
The shelter took in 8,605
animals last year and more than
6,060 of them were euthanized.
Animal services euthanizes some
animals daily in order to combat
an overpopulation problem at the
shelter. The number of animals
euthanized at the shelter and
the increasing numbers brought
in continue to be a problem.
Penley is concerned how the
switch to lethal injection will
impact her staff.
"I guess I'm a little
concerned that doing it by
injection makes it more
personal," Penley said. "That
has a positive side, and it has
a bad side. It's positive
because you are right there with
the animal, but I wonder if that
will make our people feel more
responsible like it's their
fault and it's not their fault."
Penley is monitoring her
staff members as they go the
through training to see how they
are handling the new method.
It's not usual for people who
work in animal shelters to
suffer from compassion fatigue
because of the number of animals
that are killed at the shelter.
Some staff members have attended
conferences and have received
training about how to deal with
it, Penley said.
"Sometimes it's just about
dealing with what you have to
deal with every day," Penley
said. "It's hard dealing with
some people and the problems and
unhappiness of the whole
situation."
Vicky Hunt, who started Pet
Adoption and Welfare Society in
Burlington with her husband Sam
Hunt, thinks it's important that
the shelter use the injection
method.
"The only way to euthanize,
in my opinion, is by injection,"
she said. "To me the gas chamber
is primitive. It is absolutely a
fact that animals sometimes
don't die for as much as 20
minutes. But you are still
having to put them down. One is
not humane and one is humane,
but it's one part of the
picture. What we want to do is
put fewer animals down."
More than 30 city and county
animal shelters in the state
still use gas chambers to
euthanize. The N.C. Coalition
for Humane Euthanasia is working
to get shelters throughout the
state to make the change.
The state organization
recently filed a lawsuit against
the Union County Sheriff's
Department, which operates the
county's animal shelter,
claiming that the agency
violates state laws against
cruel treatment of animals by
using carbon monoxide gas to
kill sick, injured, very old,
very young or pregnant animals
brought to the shelter in
Monroe, according to McClatchy
News Service.
http://www.thetimesnews.com/news/local_11458___article.html/moves_shelter.html
back
to top
**********************************************************
Adkins Pet Center Now Open!
The Adkins Pet Center is a state-of-the-art pet
care facility. We provide a unique combination of pet
care services such as Boarding, Grooming, a Low Cost
Spay/Neuter Clinic, and Pet Supplies & Gifts. We also house
the Project Halo Adoption Center.
Project Halo is a non-profit, no-kill rescue
organization.
The Adkins Pet Center was built
by a foundation set up by businessmen & brothers Mark & Will
Adkins, along with Marks fiancée Janet Robinson.
Animal lovers since they were children, Mark & Will have
always wanted to create a place to help animals.
The Adkins Pet Center is dedicated to helping as many
animals as possible. Through community education and
awareness programs we teach proper pet care and
requirements, breed discrimination and the importance of
eliminating pet overpopulation and cruelty. We offer an
orientation/pet education class to new adopters and provide
resources or counseling to families with behavior issues.
The Adkins Pet Center is 15,000 square feet on over 6.5
acres. The combined outside play areas are larger than a
football field and are covered with Astroturf. The
dogs have lots of toys to play with and climb on. In
the warmer months they can cool off in one of the play
pools. In the event of bad weather, we also have a
large inside playroom.
The Adkins Pet Center is inspected and licensed by the
State of North Carolina, a member of the American Boarding
Kennel Association and the Lincolnton & Mecklenburg Chambers
of Commerce.
http://www.adkinspetcenter.net/
back to
top
**********************************************************
Introducing the Triangles' ONLY mall pet adoption center!
www.animall.org
AniMall is a 4,000 square-foot
non-profit pet adoption center located in the Morrisville
Outlet Mall. (I-40, exit 284A.) AniMall sells pet-related
merchandise (including Marley tents), consignment items for
rescues, and also offers obedience training with Sylvie of
K-9 Solutions. AniMall, however, does not, nor will it ever
SELL animals of ANY kind. (Petsmart and Petco STILL sell
reptiles, birds and small mammals - ALL of whom show up in
shelters year after year in increasing numbers.)
AniMall started as an alternative to
petstores that still sell animals and/or offer little space
for rescues to bring their adoptables. AniMall provides
space, advertising and we even do ALL the clean-up. As a
rescue all you do is provide the animals!
You can sign up for any shift that
suits you M-F (10am-5:30pm) or Saturday 10am-9pm and Sunday
Noon-6pm. Our volunteers can also scheduled to be on hand to
help you hold leashes or talk to would-be adopters.
We charge a small $10 fee per rescue
per shift; however, if you hold more than one adoption event
within a given week - then you are charged only ONE fee! The
more you come, the cheaper it is, as we also offer monthly
discounts as well! Come four weekends in a row and we will
only charge you for TWO!
You also get a table and chairs at
AniMall, a tablecloth and free sodas/ bottled water for you,
your volunteers and your animals (well, they get tap water,
but you get the gist).
Are you a cat rescuer? AniMall has 7
cat condos that can hold 2-3 adult cats and several kittens
in ONE condo. Our two story condos are a great way for
adopters to see cats, PLUS we have an enclosed room JUST for
cats to interact with adopters. Dogs have a fenced
"greeting" area as well as easy access to an outdoor walk
and potty spot.
Do you have a cat or dog that does not
"interview well"? Maybe he or she is very timid and often
gets overlooked because of that?
Bring him or her to AniMall during the
week and we can guarantee that she/he will get noticed! The
best part is during the week, animals that are shy don't get
so stressed because they there is less traffic and noise.
PLUS - we have had LOTS of adoptions happen during the
weekday.
Yes, it is true that the Outlet Mall
does not get as much traffic as say, Southpoint Mall or even
the flea market; however, here are some numbers to chew on:
Average weekend number of visitors to
AniMall: 300
Average daily weekday number of
visitors: 75
Total number of adoptions at AniMall:
More than 200!
(this number is only a modest estimate,
we are certain that there are more we have not accounted
for!)
So, what are you waiting for? Contact
Jenn below and bring your cuties to animal and let's join
together in 2007 to find some wonderful pets some great
forever homes!
Contact Jenn Binkley
jenn@animall.org
back to top
**********************************************************
|