North Carolina Voters for Animal Welfare

 

 

NC ANIMAL NEWS

 

** If you have news you would like added to this page let us know. **

 

**********************************************************

Euthanasia methods scrutinized

 

 

By Gena Smith
Published:
Sunday, May 18, 2008 10:07 AM EDT
LUMBERTON — Everyone agrees that the intravenous method of putting down animals is more humane than the method currently used at the county pound. But county officials say its cost, about $70,000 a year, is too much for a poor county.

Five members of the county Health Board took a tour of the 5-year-old animal shelter last week to see the two methods of euthanasia performed.

Currently, the shelter uses the intracardiac method, or the heart stick — shots that are made directly into the heart of a sedated animal. On Wednesday, during the tour, shelter staff put five dogs and one cat to death with heart sticks. Michael Deese, a veterinarian who serves on the Health Board, performed IV euthanasia on one sedated dog to show the difference in the techniques.

“(The heart stick) way ... it may not be in the heart, just the chest cavity, and it takes longer,” Deese said as he went back checking for signs of life on the seven animals after the euthanasia had been performed.

Faith Walker, a local animal activist, has threatened legal action against the county if the IV method is not adopted. She also wants euthanasia performed in isolation, and not in front of other animals.

County Health Director Bill Smith says the heart stick is cheaper and quicker and “approved by the Humane Society.”
 

The decision to visit the county pound was made after Walker came to the April meeting of the Health Board, but Smith didn’t want to concede Wednesday’s tour was under duress.

“Several of the Board of Health members had never seen it,” Smith said. “We’ve been talking so much about the shelter, they decided to see it.”

John Adams, a member of the Health Board and local optometrist, said the tour gave him confidence.

“I just want to make sure we are within the law and within the humane guidelines,” he said after the tour. “I really don’t see where we are doing anything that someone can take legal action.”

Money and time

According to Jeff Bass, the manager of the pound, the IV method would involve two additional staff members because it takes more time.

“The big part to me is that we are done with euthanasia by 10 o’clock — the time frame the county has given us,” Bass said. “That’s the reason I said additional help would be needed.”

Bass said the IV method would call for a space that the euthanasia would be performed. Because the shelter is so long, it would take extra time to get the animals from their cages to the euthanasia table. Bass said on average, between May and September, about 50 animals are euthanized each week.

The materials, he said, wouldn’t cost much. They would include a table, swabs, alcohol and a razor.

“Is that a lot of money?” Bass said. “Probably not, but it’s still another step in the process, and you still have to spend the money.”

Tom Taylor, a county commissioner and chairman of the Health Board, said he’s not sure that money can be found. The commissioners held a budget workshop last week and reviewed a county budget that keeps the tax rate the same, includes a hiring freeze, and delays capital projects.

“Right now, I don’t see where we’re able to do it,” Taylor said. “Were trying to keep taxes down.”

Adams agreed.

“The biggest constraint would be the monetary thing,” Adams said. “My question was: Is there someway to increase the revenue to raise the money ... What the county can afford, I think, it’s the practical thing to do.”

The shelter opens to the public at 10 a.m., giving the three-person staff two hours to put the animals to death and clean up for the public.

But according Walker, additional staff isn’t necessary.

“It’s just another excuse not to do the proper thing,” Walker said. “If they can’t be out there at work and get things done, they need to get to work an hour earlier.”

Lee Hunter, director of Animal Welfare for the North Carolina Department of Agriculture, said he isn’t sure about time and cost, but he’s sure about skill level.

“It doesn’t require as much skill to do it intravenous,” Hunter said. “When you do it intracardiac you have to hit a place that you cannot see. In an IV, you can see the vein you are trying to hit.”

Euthanasia room

When the building was built in 2003, a room was created specifically for euthanasia. However, that room now holds cats.

“It has, at times, been used for euthanasia,” Smith said. “But again, when the regulations changed as to the number of cats you could have per pen, we had to have more space for cats.”

Smith said it is the staff that decides on space use.

“Where that room is at, it’s not feasible,” Bass said. “The room you could use, but then where do you put the animals once they are euthanized? Once the medicine goes into the system they don’t die right away. If you have a big day that day, that room isn’t going to hold everybody.”

The building currently has unused space toward the rear.

“We could always go back there in the back and go off to the side,” Bass said. “It would be time consuming to move the animals all the way to the back.”

Walker, with tears in her eyes, said People for Ethical Treatment of Animals says euthanasia should never be performed in front of others. Walker doesn’t stand alone on this issue.

Ken Windley, the county manager, wrote a letter to Smith dated Dec. 4, 2003, that read in part: “The front left room was to be the euthanasia room. I would recommend it be used and not put animals to sleep in cages.”

Last week Windley said he has no authority over the health director.

“The front room was set up for that purpose, if he wanted to use it for the purpose,” Windley said. “I guess they’ve chosen to do their euthanasia elsewhere ... the (health) board and the staff decides where to do it.”

On Wednesday, the cat was euthanized in its cage and the dogs were euthanized right outside the open cages.

“I guess they could figure someway to move the dogs to another room,” Adams said. “In an ideal world, we’d have them all adopted.”

No state law

State laws don’t exist for euthanasia, but that is expected to soon change.

“At this point in time there are no certain requirements under state law,” Hunter said.

According to Brian Long, director of Public Affairs for the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, there are no training requirements to perform euthanasia, and no specifics on where it is performed.

Long said the new laws would require certification for administering euthanasia. They would also place specific guidelines on how and where euthanasia takes place.

“Until they take effect there are no real standards or requirements in place,” Long said. “If the Rules Review Commission signs off on them, then my understanding is they take effect 30 days after that. It could be within the next couple of months or it could be within the year.”

Adams said it might be more prudent to wait for the state before changes are made.

“ ... What they are doing is within the law and within the Humane Society’s guidelines, and we’re about to have a new law ... why do something now when you’ll have to change things anyway,” Adams said.

 

back to top

**********************************************************

 

Published: May 13, 2008 05:32 PM
Modified: May 13, 2008 05:32 PM


Record number of pets adopted



By Sarah McNeil, Staff Reporter

Johnston County — It was love at first sight for Heather Combs.

For months, Combs and her three daughters had been looking for a companion for their two dogs, Milo and Jesse. Their search ended at the Johnston County Animal Shelter, where they spotted Jackie, a 2-year-old Husky mix.

Jackie and her two puppies had been surrendered to the shelter. The puppies were quickly adopted, but Jackie sat in a lonely cage for two weeks before Combs came along.

“Every other dog in the whole place was barking and [Jackie] just sat there, just as pretty as can be,” said Combs, of the Cleveland community. “I said, ‘We are not going to leave her, so let’s take her home.’”

Jackie was one of 127 animals adopted from the shelter in March. Director Ernie Wilkinson said it was the highest number of animals ever adopted from the shelter in one month. On average, about 30 pets a month find a new home, he said.

But thanks to the media, dedicated staff and the help of more than 25 foster and rescue groups, more people are adopting from the shelter, Wilkinson said. “This is where we have been working to be for three years,” he said. “We are finally beginning to get there.”

Coming to a new home has been an adjustment for Jackie. She can still be mischievous, digging holes in the yard, eating rental-movie cases and hogging the bed. The feisty dog enjoys watching television and appliances, such as the fan, in motion. Jackie was the first dog the Combs adopted from a shelter, but she certainly won’t be the last.

“Now I tell everybody ‘You need to go to one of the shelters and get a dog,’” Combs said.

“I would definitely say if you have room in your home and in your heart, definitely go to the shelter and give a dog a second chance. I don’t think we could have picked a better dog from the shelter.”

Another dog, Girly Girl, has been a comfort to Liz Parrish of Four Oaks and her daughter, Morgan, since their Golden retriever Champ died unexpectedly in March. Girly Girl, originally named Harley, was found wandering on Brodgen Road near Smithfield and carried to the shelter.

Parrish and her daughter were impressed with Girly Girl’s quiet demeanor. “It was something about her...it was almost like her eyes were smiling at you,” Parrish said

As Parrish took a closer look, she noticed the American bull and boxer mix had scars on her back, hip and face. The scars made Parrish think the dog’s former owner had abused her.

“I can’t stand to see an abused animal,” she said. “There is no point to it. They can’t defend themselves. There are so many out there that need homes just like we need homes.”

Girly Girl fits in with the family perfectly. She loves to look out the window, eat sandals and chew on squeaky toys. The 1-year-old dog enjoys sitting on laps and having her tummy rubbed when she is not playing outside in the yard. “It’s like she’s always been here,” Parrish said.

Girly Girl might not be the only pet for much longer.

“We are thinking of fostering or getting another dog,” Parrish said. “People need to be more aware of the animal shelter, and they do have the best animals, period.”

http://www.theherald-nc.com/front/story/8173.html

 

back to top

**********************************************************

Video of Alleged Animal Abuse by Trooper Played in Court

Former Sgt. Charles Jones
A court hearing began Monday to decide whether a state trooper fired for alleged animal abuse will get his job back.

Former Sgt. Charles Jones, a 12-year veteran in charge of K-9 training for the Highway Patrol, was fired in September after another trooper turned over two 15-second video clips of him allegedly abusing his K-9 partner, Ricoh.

(Caution: Contents of the video may disturb some viewers.)

The Office of Administrative Hearings – a quasi-judicial agency – began proceedings Monday in a lawsuit that Jones filed against the state in December, alleging that procedures were violated when he was fired. The hearing will reconvene on Tuesday.

Monday's proceedings focused on the video clips that Trooper Ray Herndon recorded on his cell phone after he saw Jones using what he thought might be abusive techniques at a training exercise in Garner last summer.

"I was torn; I didn't know what to do. Should I go stop him?" Herndon, a 21-year-veteran of the force, testified Monday. "So I did what I thought was right at the time."

Court documents say the incident began when Ricoh refused to release a chew reward. One video shows Jones tying the dog's leash to a high railing so that only his hind legs touched the ground. He then kicked the dog's leg four times.

"Then he'd pull him back up a good distance off the ground, using the lead in an attempt to get the dog to lech the toy or let the toy go," Herndon said. He added that he did not think Jones was intentionally trying to harm or abuse Ricoh.

The second video clip shows Jones apparently leaving the dog alone, hanging upright from its leash and collar.

Jones' lawyer, Jack O'Hale, claimed that the video clips show Jones using training techniques that he had been taught by the Highway Patrol. Ricoh was a particularly aggressive dog that required extra training, the attorney said.

"Sgt. Jones acted in the manner in which he was trained, even though it was an ugly manner," O'Hale said.

The Highway Patrol's manual does not specify any dog-training methods that are banned or allowed, O'Hale said. He described commonly used methods, such as swinging a dog around by the neck or wrestling it to the ground and holding its jaws open, that could be considered abusive.

Capt. Ken Castelloe, head of the patrol's internal affairs office, testified that the first video clip was ordinary, but not the second. Castelloe said he was disturbed that Jones had left Ricoh after the dog dropped the toy.

Bryan Beatty, secretary of the state Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, testified that Jones was fired only after a careful review.

"I concluded that that was not a technique that anyone had seen," Beatty said. "It was not a technique that was acceptable within Highway Patrol policy."

O'Hale repeated charged that the Governor's Press Office pressured the Highway Patrol to fire Jones without due process. In a deposition last week, Lt. Col. Cecil Lockley said that "unlawful political intervention" forced him to fire Jones.

Beatty and the Highway Patrol made public their intentions to fire Jones a day before his pre-dismissal hearing, O'Hale said.

The assistant district attorney argued that the video itself provided enough evidence to justify Jones' firing, and the state did not act inappropriately.

In court documents, the Highway Patrol said that Beatty, not Lockley, made the final decision to fire Jones.

O'Hale argued that Jones became a victim of the Highway Patrol's efforts to clean up after a series of embarrassing misconduct allegations were laid against troopers. The incident also occurred during the height of the dog-fighting scandal surrounding Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick, the attorney said.

Gov. Mike Easley ordered the Highway Patrol to hire a consultant to review its procedures, including the hiring, training and promotion of troopers. The consultant's findings are expected in the next few weeks.

A veterinarian examined Ricoh and found that he was OK shortly after the training exercise. The Highway Patrol removed Ricoh from Jones' care, and the dog is no longer actively working on the force.

 

 http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/2803389

 

back to top

**********************************************************

 

 

Article of the week from North Carolina Lawyers Weekly:

Animals first in new firm

By DIANA SMITH, Staff Writer

 

A little girl scrambles along the edge of a swimming pool at a Wisconsin resort, her eyes fixed upon a chipmunk flailing in the aqua water.

Her parents, escorting her to dinner, assure her that the furry creature will paddle its way to safety. But on the family's return trip, it was still struggling.

Before anyone can stop her, the youngster seizes the animal, and it scurries to safety but not before thanking her with a farewell bite.

That was Raleigh attorney Calley Gerber at age six, a compassionate child with a love for two things animals and how to protect them.

"It's always been that way," she said. "Animals first."

Now, Gerber is applying that sentiment to her profession. Today, she opens her own practice Gerber Animal Law Center which will focus exclusively on animal issues.

It's the first of its kind in North Carolina, according to Bill Reppy, who heads Duke University's Animal Law Project. Other lawyers might handle a handful of cases involving animals cruelty, dog bites, custody issues but very few strike out into such territory on their own. Reppy knows of just two attorneys who have created self-sustaining animal law practices, one in Illinois and the other in Washington state.

That makes Gerber's new firm a groundbreaking, but risky, venture. And she knows it.

"I decided to open an animal law firm, which some people which all people say you can't make a living at," Gerber said. "If it's meant to be, it's meant to be. I've done a lot of things people told me I couldn't do."

But increased attention to animal abuse in recent years, both in the Carolinas and nationally, may mean that the tides have turned in Gerber's favor. North Carolina is the only state in the nation with a statute that allows private litigants to bring civil charges against violators of animal cruelty laws.

Other positive examples: In the past three years, laws were passed in both Carolinas that upgraded cockfighting to felonies. In 2006, South Carolina became the fourth state in the nation to ban "hog dog" fighting, where trained attack dogs fight trapped feral pigs.

Still, North Carolina placed in the bottom tier for the comprehensiveness of its state animal protection laws in 2007, according to an Animal Legal Defense Fund study. South Carolina fared slightly better, ranked in the middle tier.

A lifelong animal lover, Apex attorney Marianna Burt felt that she would be unable to make a living with an animal-only practice when she graduated from UNC in 1989. Today, she relies on her indigent criminal defense work as her bread and butter, but devotes 50 percent of her time to animal law cases. However, 60-70 percent of that animal work is pro bono, she said.

But winds of change appear to be blowing. Ninety-six of the 196 ABA-accredited law schools in the United States now offer courses in animal law, up from nine that offered them in 2000.

"This is probably the right time for someone to be doing this full-time," said Burt. "Certain practices that are more lucrative, such as veterinary malpractice and custody issues, are really taking the field. You didn't see that a few years ago."

'SAVE THE WORLD'

Gerber's decision to open her animal law firm did not come easily. She spent her first five years after law school as a prosecutor in Colorado a dream come true for the woman who wanted to use her position to promote legal reform.

"But then my student loans came out of deferment, and I realized that I couldn't live on that," she said. "I was taking a pack of Saltines and a can of peas for lunch. I literally lost two sizes in one month. I finally had to say, 'If I'm going to starve to death to prosecute, I probably should do something else.'"

Gerber moved to North Carolina and joined Wakefield Development as in-house counsel. But after eight years, she felt increasingly unfulfilled. She just didn't love her work.

"I've always had that 'save the world' pull. I think that's why I wanted to prosecute," she said. "But I told myself to be grateful that I had a job that allowed me to pay my debts."

With her two dogs, Presley and Justice, at her side, she sought happiness through increased activity with Great Dane rescue and other animal organizations.

But spending 40 or more hours of the business week doing unrewarding work took its toll. Gerber began to doubt if she was even meant to be an attorney a terrifying thought for a woman who told her mother at age 12 that she was going to be a lawyer.

So she hired a life coach.

A battery of tests revealed two things: Gerber was born to be a lawyer. But she would never be happy in corporate law.

"The next day, I quit," she said.

She gave Wakefield three months notice. It was not an acrimonious breakup. Before her departure, the company even created a temporary Web page for Gerber to advertise her new endeavor.

Doubt inevitably crept in.

"The reality of quitting feels good for the first five minutes, and then there's this 'Oh, my God, how am I going to pay my bills?' sensation," she said.

"Then I decided fear is not a positive emotion and that I had to let the bad stuff go so that good things could come in."

And so Gerber Animal Law Center was born.

DREAM BIG

Gerber's life coach posed a hypothetical question: "You're on the cover of a national publication. What's the magazine and what's the story?"

"It was the easiest question for me to answer," she said. "I'm on the cover of Time magazine, and I've stopped factory farming."

Indeed, the treatment of farm animals is one of the issues that Gerber hopes to tackle as she develops her animal law practice. One exemption to the criminal statutes for animal abuse N.C. G.S. Sect. 14-360 precludes prosecution for cruelty to animals raised for food and agribusiness.

"The abandonment of the North Carolina legislature about the treatment of farm animals is shocking," said Reppy, from Duke. "It's so irrational that it's unconstitutional."

That's why Reppy is "simply delighted" that Gerber is willing to be an animal law pioneer. He envisions collaboration between Duke's animal law clinic and Gerber's new practice.

"We'll be able to help Calley by getting the students in our clinic to work with her and do research," Reppy said.

And while Gerber has her dream projects like the creation of more humane livestock laws, teaching at area law schools and amending the law that treats animals as property she is adamant that she is a realist, not an extremist.

"I'm not saying that animals need to have the status of human beings, but at the same time, if someone intentionally kills your animal, they shouldn't only recover just the actual cost of property," she said.

"If your dog is a mutt, you get zero damages under the market value test in most states. It just isn't clear where North Carolina stands on that," Reppy said.

In the past few weeks, publicity and word-of-mouth has led more than a dozen people to call Gerber with animal law questions. One woman wanted to know what actions she could take against a neighbor who shot and killed her dog as it ran away from him.

"A lot of people just want someone to listen to them," said Gerber. "Granted, that doesn't make any money or make the firm go, but in the early stages that's what I've been doing."

The sad reality is that some of those callers will have to be turned away.

"To sue is costly, and the remedy is limited in these cases, so there's a decision to make," Gerber said. "I know a lot of these cases will be take-it-and-lose, take-it-and-lose, take-it-and lose. But at the same time, that's how the laws get changed."

FOCUS AND PRIORITIES

Exactly what will Gerber Animal Law Center do?

It's a work in progress, Gerber said.

While she would never shy away from prosecuting, one of the major focuses of Gerber's firm will be preventive measures that protect animals.

Included in that category is the establishment of pet trusts and estates. According to the 2007-2008 National Pet Owners Survey, 63 percent of American households now own pets. But very few owners have set up protections for them when they die.

"Five hundred thousand animals are euthanized each year because owners haven't made provisions for them," said Gerber.

Gerber also wants to use her legal expertise to help people in animal-related professions such as dog groomers and dog-walkers set up businesses and draft contracts. Also falling under the umbrella could be veterinary malpractice cases. She'd even be happy to do special prosecution if the D.A.'s office was overburdened, she said.

One of Gerber's grand visions is to see a rescue organization hold a fundraiser that would give it the money to retain her services to go after someone accused of cruelty, such as dog-fighters.

"I don't know if this is something I can live on," she said. "I've been told that it's been tried before and that it's very, very hard, depressing work. Because the protections aren't there, you're constantly faced with not being able to get the right thing done. You have to tell people that the law isn't there yet. I know that people won't necessarily be calling me because they're happy. Usually something bad has happened.

"Maybe I've read too many of those books: Follow your passion and everything else will fall into place. I've been in practice 12 years. If I fall on my face, I can get another job. But if I never try, how will I know?

"You achieve what you believe, and I very much believe that."

Questions or comments may be directed to diana.smith@nc.lawyersweekly.com.

ANIMAL LAW EDUCATION

A look at what law schools in North Carolina offer in animal law courses and related student organizations:

Duke University

- Home to the Animal Law Project, which offers courses and a clinic.

- Has the student Animal Law Society.

Wake Forest University

- First offered an animal law course in Fall 2004.

- Established a Student Animal Legal Defense Fund chapter this year.

 

http://www.nclawyersweekly.com

back to top

**********************************************************

 

Officials Seize 77 Dogs From Home

April 13th, 2008
 

 

By Melanie Davis and Caroline Monday
Melanie@mountaintimes.com
CMonday@mountaintimes.com

CLICK HERE FOR RELATED VIDEO
Seventy-seven dogs and three dead puppies were seized during a search warrant executed at a home located at 10430 N.C. 194 north near Todd Thursday evening.

The search warrant was the result of a joint investigation between the Watauga County Sheriff’s Office and the Watauga County Animal Care and Control department.


Animal Care and Control officer Steve Norris holds one of
the seized dogs that appears to be suffering from mange.
Photo by Caroline Monday

According to officers with Animal Care and Control, the investigation began with a stray dog picked up in that area of the county. The dog was in poor condition leading to an investigation.

On March 13 Animal Control officers visited the residence on N.C. 194 with a sheriff’s deputy and seized three dogs and one dead dog.

Anna Mae Warner, 18, was charged at that time with three counts of cruelty to animals, with another charge filed at a later date. She is scheduled to appear in district court on April 22 in lieu of a $2,500 unsecured bond to face those charges.

The investigation into Warner’s treatment of the numerous animals at her home continued after that arrest warrant was served.

Warner is alleged to have been breeding “toy” dogs for sale. Of the animals seized, there were miniature schnauzer, Papillon, Maltese, Jack Russell, toy poodles, Yorkshire terriers, shih tzu, chihauhua, pug, Pomeranian, spitz, Pekingese, Boston terrier and cocker spaniel breeds.

A statement from the sheriff’s office said the cause of the seizure was the lack of medical treatment for the dogs and the animals not being fed and watered properly.

Local veterinarians are seeing the animals beginning on Friday, treating them for malnutrition, dehydration and mange.


Seventy-seven animals were seized at one time.
Photo by Caroline Monday

The investigation by the Watauga County Sheriff’s Office is ongoing and further charges against Warner are pending.

The bulk of the animals are being housed at the Animal Care and Control office, while the Watauga County Humane Society is assisting the officers with the care of the animals.

The younger puppies, pregnant dogs and some others are in the Humane Society’s shelter. That location is better equipped to handle those special needs animals, according to officials.

The dogs that have been seized are considered evidence in a criminal case. Therefore, the animals are not available for adoption or foster care. They must remain in the custody of Animal Control and the Humane Society until the disposal of the case through the court system. The Animal Control officers may only feed, clean and provide medical care to the animals until a decision is reached in court.

The public can help by fostering the other dogs in the care of Animal Control. The facility is near full capacity due to the seizure.

Other strays and unwanted animals need foster homes until a permanent location can be found.


The animals will be kept at the county facilities and at the Humane
Society shelter until the court decides the case.
Photo by Caroline Monday

Warner’s operation falls under the classification of a puppy mill. The legal definition of this term is anyone who owns more than five breeding age, unspayed female dogs and is not licensed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture as a dog breeder.

Humane Society shelter manager Lynn Northup said, “The problem with puppy mills is that they do not care about the quality of the animals. There is more concern for the money than for their care and well being.”

Northup also gave warning signs for those interested in purchasing a pure breed dog. “If you’re going to buy a pet instead of getting one from a shelter or a breed rescue, ask to see the parents, ask to see where they were living.”

She said red flags to look for include advertisements for five to six different breeds from the same person, or the breeder asking to meet in a parking lot or place other than the kennel.


Photo by Caroline Monday

 

back to top

**********************************************************

 

Mar 18, 2008
Forest Service rejects raccoon, bear hunt proposal

By Harrison Metzger
Times-News Staff Writer

The N.C. Forest Service has rejected a proposal from state wildlife officials to allow bear and raccoon hunting with dogs on DuPont State Forest this year.

The Division of Forest Resources approved a plan by the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission to expand deer hunting season from two to three days a week, adding Thursday to lottery hunts that have in the past been held on Friday and Saturday each fall.

But following the second consecutive year of public opposition to hunting with dogs at DuPont, the Forest Service rejected plans for bear and raccoon hunts at the 10,400-acre forest.

"We are going to sit down with the Wildlife Commission and look at those bear populations out there right now to see what they need to do to manage that resource," State Forester Wib Owen said Monday. "That (bear hunting) will be on hold until we have a chance to sit down and evaluate that."

Owen said his agency made the decision in collaboration with the secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

The Wildlife Resources Commission first proposed bear hunting last year, citing complaints of nuisance bears from developments near the forest. DuPont straddles the southern border of Henderson and Transylvania counties and is the most popular state forest in North Carolina for hikers, cyclists, equestrians and other outdoor enthusiasts.

However some residents who live near the forest and others who use DuPont objected to hunting with dogs. They said hunting dogs should not be allowed off leash because other forest users are required to keep their dogs leashed.

State officials say the black bear population has been growing in the mountains and across the state, but they don't have any specific data for how many bears inhabit DuPont and surrounding lands.

"We weren't ready to evaluate or make that decision until we looked at the data," Owen said.

The DuPont State Forest Advisory Committee split on the issue of whether to allow bear and raccoon hunting, but supported expanding lottery hunting for deer from two to three days weekly during hunting season.

Transylvania County resident Charles Parris, who represents sportsmen on the advisory committee, favored allowing the bear and raccoon hunts. Parris said dogs already roam freely in DuPont because it is hard to enforce the leash law.

He said he was not surprised by the decision, but was not happy about it.

"I still think there's plenty of bear. I know there are," said Parris, who hunts deer but not bear. "I still think really and truly they should have listened to the wildlife resources on it. They know the population."

But Gloria Clouse, president of the Friends of DuPont Forest, praised the decision. The group of volunteers opposed bear hunting with dogs on the forest.

"I think they are taking a very good approach to study it further and really get some solid data on the bear population to see if they do need to have a hunt," Clouse said. "I think it is really good they are collecting the data first and making a decision afterwards. "


Click here to go to website
 

back to top

 **********************************************************

 

Local shelter moves away from gas, toward injection for euthanasia

 

 
After years of euthanizing dogs and cats in a gas chamber, the Alamance County animal shelter within a few weeks will do most of its euthanizing through lethal injection.

Some animal activists have opposed use of the gas chamber at the shelter, arguing that it is inhumane. While the state allows shelters to use properly operated gas chambers, Burlington Animal Services decided to change to the lethal-injection method because it's considered more acceptable by the public.

"People tend to relate gas to Nazi war times," said Tamee Penley, supervisor of animal services. "I think you can do anything wrong. I think there is a proper way to use gas and a proper way to use injection."

The hope is that implementing the change will improve people's perceptions of the animal shelter, said Burlington police Capt. Greg Seel, who oversees the shelter.

"We've heard both sides of it for years," Seel said. "Switching over to injection may help the image that animal shelters have."

Regardless of the switch, animal services will not eliminate the gas chamber.

"The plan is to keep it for wildlife and dangerous animals and situations where safety is an issue," Penley said. "I don't think that percentage will be very big."

Before animal services could even consider switching its euthanasia methods, renovations had to be done at the shelter so there was space available to do injections. A barn was renovated to make room for it.

"We lowered the ceiling and put some tables and lights in there," Penley said. "It's away from everything and quieter so we actually have a place to do it now."

About six weeks ago, the staff at animal services started training to perform the procedure. They have all received the classroom portion of the training, and several of them are still working on the hands-on training, which is being done under the supervision of a retired veterinarian, Dr. Donald Courtney.

The shelter took in 8,605 animals last year and more than 6,060 of them were euthanized. Animal services euthanizes some animals daily in order to combat an overpopulation problem at the shelter. The number of animals euthanized at the shelter and the increasing numbers brought in continue to be a problem. Penley is concerned how the switch to lethal injection will impact her staff.

"I guess I'm a little concerned that doing it by injection makes it more personal," Penley said. "That has a positive side, and it has a bad side. It's positive because you are right there with the animal, but I wonder if that will make our people feel more responsible like it's their fault and it's not their fault."

Penley is monitoring her staff members as they go the through training to see how they are handling the new method.

It's not usual for people who work in animal shelters to suffer from compassion fatigue because of the number of animals that are killed at the shelter. Some staff members have attended conferences and have received training about how to deal with it, Penley said.

"Sometimes it's just about dealing with what you have to deal with every day," Penley said. "It's hard dealing with some people and the problems and unhappiness of the whole situation."

Vicky Hunt, who started Pet Adoption and Welfare Society in Burlington with her husband Sam Hunt, thinks it's important that the shelter use the injection method.

"The only way to euthanize, in my opinion, is by injection," she said. "To me the gas chamber is primitive. It is absolutely a fact that animals sometimes don't die for as much as 20 minutes. But you are still having to put them down. One is not humane and one is humane, but it's one part of the picture. What we want to do is put fewer animals down."

More than 30 city and county animal shelters in the state still use gas chambers to euthanize. The N.C. Coalition for Humane Euthanasia is working to get shelters throughout the state to make the change.

The state organization recently filed a lawsuit against the Union County Sheriff's Department, which operates the county's animal shelter, claiming that the agency violates state laws against cruel treatment of animals by using carbon monoxide gas to kill sick, injured, very old, very young or pregnant animals brought to the shelter in Monroe, according to McClatchy News Service.

http://www.thetimesnews.com/news/local_11458___article.html/moves_shelter.html

 

back to top

 **********************************************************

 

Adkins Pet Center Now Open!

The Adkins Pet Center is a state-of-the-art pet care facility.  We provide a unique combination of pet care services such as Boarding, Grooming, a Low Cost Spay/Neuter Clinic, and Pet Supplies & Gifts. We also house the Project Halo Adoption Center. Project Halo is a non-profit, no-kill rescue organization.

The Adkins Pet Center was built by a foundation set up by businessmen & brothers Mark & Will Adkins, along with Marks fiancée Janet Robinson.  Animal lovers since they were children, Mark & Will have always wanted to create a place to help animals.

The Adkins Pet Center is dedicated to helping as many animals as possible. Through community education and awareness programs we teach proper pet care and requirements, breed discrimination and the importance of eliminating pet overpopulation and cruelty.  We offer an orientation/pet education class to new adopters and provide resources or counseling to families with behavior issues.  

The Adkins Pet Center is 15,000 square feet on over 6.5 acres. The combined outside play areas are larger than a football field and are covered with Astroturf.  The dogs have lots of toys to play with and climb on.  In the warmer months they can cool off in one of the play pools.  In the event of bad weather, we also have a large inside playroom.

The Adkins Pet Center is inspected and licensed by the State of North Carolina, a member of the American Boarding Kennel Association and the Lincolnton & Mecklenburg Chambers of Commerce.

http://www.adkinspetcenter.net/

 

back to top

**********************************************************

 

Introducing the Triangles' ONLY mall pet adoption center!

www.animall.org

AniMall is a 4,000 square-foot non-profit pet adoption center located in the Morrisville Outlet Mall. (I-40, exit 284A.) AniMall sells pet-related merchandise (including Marley tents), consignment items for rescues, and also offers obedience training with Sylvie of K-9 Solutions. AniMall, however, does not, nor will it ever SELL animals of ANY kind. (Petsmart and Petco STILL sell reptiles, birds and small mammals - ALL of whom show up in shelters year after year in increasing numbers.)

AniMall started as an alternative to petstores that still sell animals and/or offer little space for rescues to bring their adoptables. AniMall provides space, advertising and we even do ALL the clean-up. As a rescue all you do is provide the animals!

You can sign up for any shift that suits you M-F (10am-5:30pm) or Saturday 10am-9pm and Sunday Noon-6pm. Our volunteers can also scheduled to be on hand to help you hold leashes or talk to would-be adopters.

We charge a small $10 fee per rescue per shift; however, if you hold more than one adoption event within a given week - then you are charged only ONE fee! The more you come, the cheaper it is, as we also offer monthly discounts as well! Come four weekends in a row and we will only charge you for TWO!

You also get a table and chairs at AniMall, a tablecloth and free sodas/ bottled water for you, your volunteers and your animals (well, they get tap water, but you get the gist).

Are you a cat rescuer? AniMall has 7 cat condos that can hold 2-3 adult cats and several kittens in ONE condo. Our two story condos are a great way for adopters to see cats, PLUS we have an enclosed room JUST for cats to interact with adopters. Dogs have a fenced "greeting" area as well as easy access to an outdoor walk and potty spot.

Do you have a cat or dog that does not "interview well"? Maybe he or she is very timid and often gets overlooked because of that?

Bring him or her to AniMall during the week and we can guarantee that she/he will get noticed! The best part is during the week, animals that are shy don't get so stressed because they there is less traffic and noise. PLUS - we have had LOTS of adoptions happen during the weekday.

Yes, it is true that the Outlet Mall does not get as much traffic as say, Southpoint Mall or even the flea market; however, here are some numbers to chew on:

Average weekend number of visitors to AniMall: 300

Average daily weekday number of visitors: 75

Total number of adoptions at AniMall: More than 200!

(this number is only a modest estimate, we are certain that there are more we have not accounted for!)

So, what are you waiting for? Contact Jenn below and bring your cuties to animal and let's join together in 2007 to find some wonderful pets some great forever homes!

Contact Jenn Binkley  jenn@animall.org

back to top

**********************************************************